No one thinking it could be an IIIE?
Well, I have a crush for IIIE right now so I'm hoping for a new member
of that group. If it is it could add to the knowledge of how the IIIE
irons were created.
No specific reason, just a feeling based on the inclusions and "look and
feel" (expecting to be shot down within minutes of this message reaches
the list).
So far, I haven't heard anyone saying "It can't be a .... because ...."
That would actually be more interesting than hearing peoples guesses.
:-)
/Göran
Martin Altmann wrote:
IAB-ungrouped ! With almost 10% Ni. Yess.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 5. April 2007 22:22
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [meteorite-list] New Iron Contest
Anne's guess: Anomalous Ungrouped Iron
Ingo's guess: IIICD iron
Bernd's guess: Silicate-bearing IIE-ungrouped; artificially reheated
Best wishes,
Bernd
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
