Hadn't the Occam's Razor explanation of this object been that it was part of a 
tub grinder ejected during operations while grinding up some dead trees several 
hundred yards away?  They showed one of these babies in operation on the 
Discovery Channel several weeks ago, and I could easily believe one of the 
chipper blades broke loose and flew on the appropriate trajectory (it looks 
like the Sarlacc from Star Wars, with layers of rotating teeth).  It seems to 
me part of "research" should be asking the guys who were using the tub grinder 
"Hey, did you lose any of the blades out of this thing on such-and-such a date? 
 If so, do you know where the piece went?"  Also, checking to see if the 
composition of the "meteorite" was comparable with a tub grinder blade.Tracy 
LatimerTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sat, 12 May 2007 06:26:42 
-0400Subject: [meteorite-list] "SNEAKY LITTLE DEVILS" NJO CONFIRMED 
METEORWRONGIt has finally been determined by experts that the NJO is not a 
meteorite.  In Friday's AP story, Rutgers University geologist Jerry Delaney 
was quoted as saying,"I was wrong. Sneaky little devil."The second sentiment is 
not even remotely accurate.  As I mentioned to the list in January, there was 
absolutely nothing about the NJO which resembled a new meteorite. I advised the 
Newark Star Ledger, The New York Times and AP in writing that the NJO was not a 
meteorite. I contacted the museum at Rutgers prior to their exhibition of the 
object---which generated the largest attendance on a single day---that this was 
not a meteorite.   The only "sneaky little devils" are the folks at Rutgers 
University. Stories are released on Friday nights so the story will miss the 
news cycle.  It's for stories that would cause embarrassment; it's for those 
moments where you hope the story disappears.This is just so deplorable---and 
it's not an isolated instance of how an institution with something to 
gain---and the media---work.  But for scientists to be so sloppy in THEIR work 
is just so....disappointing. As I wrote to the list several months ago: "While 
[this] may ultimately be among the most unusual freshly fallen meteorites known 
to exist, such an assessment cannot and should not ever have been made by 
simply passing it around for a casual analysis and singing kumbaya."Here is the 
latest story....in case you missed it. 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070511/ap_on_sc/fallen_object Depth of Field 
Management1501 Broadway  Suite 1304New York, New York  10036212.302.9200Just 
Released / THE BAD PLUS - PROGComing 5/22/07 / MICHAEL BRECKER - PILGRIMAGE 
_________________________________________________________________
Create the ultimate e-mail address book. Import your contacts to Windows Live 
Hotmail.
www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/managemail2.html?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGLM_HMWL_reten_impcont_0507
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to