Blah, blah, blah. The fleas will never comprehend the dog. Bill
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:36:48 +0200 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically provenor > afarce > > " Hätte man sämtliche Berge der ganzen Welt, > zusammengetragen und übereinandergestellt > und wäre zu Füßen dieses Massivs, > ein riesiges Meer, ein breites und tiefs. > Und stürzte nun, unter Donnern und Blitzen > der Berg in dieses Meer na das würd spritzen!" > Heinz Erhardt > > Sorry, Jerry, no time for translation, Ensisheim is coming! > > Martin > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > Gerald > Flaherty > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2007 18:27 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically provenor > afarce > > "SOME say the world will end in fire > Some say ice > From what I've tasted of desire > I'd hold those who favor fire > But if it had to perish twice > I think I know enough of hate > To know that for destruction > Ice is great > And would suffice" Robert Frost AKA chillman > > Jerry Flaherty > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:03 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Global Warming - Scientifically proven or > afarce > > >> Good evening Folks, >> >> Not wanting to intentionally stir the "pot of angst", I won't share my >> opinions regarding the validity of the global warming theory......in >> great > >> part >> because it conflicts with the beliefs of roughly half of the List and, >> arguably, >> neither extreme (entirely pro or con) position is capable of clear and >> convincing scientific proof at this stage. And also, because, in >> greater >> part, I will >> admit that I am truly uncertain which argument has greater credibility. >> >> I would submit two widely held, and generally accepted, scientific >> theorems >> to consider before taking sides in this debate: >> 1. Entropy >> 2. Perpetual Motion >> >> Best regards, >> >> Paul Martyn >> Savannah GA >> >> >> >> ************************************** See what's free at >> http://www.aol.com. >> ______________________________________________ >> Meteorite-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
