wow.

charitable good work is a wonderful thing---and one does not have to have contributed to a given cause to be critical of execution of its mission.

no one upon whom devastation has been visited wants to be encumbered with ANY agenda other than charitable good work. none of this should ever have made it to a newspaper, and to the extent the media was invited---that's really the only problem, and it does qualify as grandstanding. by whom? don't know.


Depth of Field Management
1501 Broadway  Suite 1304
New York, New York  10036
212.302.9200

Just Released
THE BAD PLUS - PROG
MICHAEL BRECKER - PILGRIMAGE





On Jul 7, 2007, at 3:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 7/6/2007 9:47:28 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:26:54 -0700, you  wrote:


Grandstanding?  By whom?


Reading that article (if the article is accurate) I kinda have to agree. All the time, effort, and donations put into collecting that money was nobile and admirable. Wanting to present it in public in the form of a giant check is
just
tacky,  IMHO.
--------------------------------------------------------------

Darren!
Did you contribute anything?
No, you don't need to respond.

.
The people of Greensburg need a lot more help, and using a large check is a
way to get some attention to this cause.
It worked!  You are all talking about it!


Anne M. Black
www.IMPACTIKA.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
President,  I.M.C.A. Inc.
www.IMCA.cc




************************************** See what's free at http:// www.aol.com.
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to