wow.
charitable good work is a wonderful thing---and one does not have to
have contributed to a given cause to be critical of execution of its
mission.
no one upon whom devastation has been visited wants to be encumbered
with ANY agenda other than charitable good work. none of this should
ever have made it to a newspaper, and to the extent the media was
invited---that's really the only problem, and it does qualify as
grandstanding. by whom? don't know.
Depth of Field Management
1501 Broadway Suite 1304
New York, New York 10036
212.302.9200
Just Released
THE BAD PLUS - PROG
MICHAEL BRECKER - PILGRIMAGE
On Jul 7, 2007, at 3:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/6/2007 9:47:28 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 06 Jul 2007 20:26:54 -0700, you wrote:
Grandstanding? By whom?
Reading that article (if the article is accurate) I kinda have to
agree. All
the time, effort, and donations put into collecting that money was
nobile and
admirable. Wanting to present it in public in the form of a giant
check is
just
tacky, IMHO.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Darren!
Did you contribute anything?
No, you don't need to respond.
.
The people of Greensburg need a lot more help, and using a large
check is a
way to get some attention to this cause.
It worked! You are all talking about it!
Anne M. Black
www.IMPACTIKA.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
President, I.M.C.A. Inc.
www.IMCA.cc
************************************** See what's free at http://
www.aol.com.
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list