Sterling K. Webb wrote: >There's something re-assuring about the notion >that we could detect a "potential impactor," >even if we didn't immediately recognize that >it's one of ours!
There is a discussion, which expresses similar thoughts, of Rosetta, AKA "2007 VN84", in: That's no near-Earth object, it's a spaceship By Emily Lakdawalla, Nov. 9, 2007, http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00001227/ Yours, Paul H. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
