Hi Ed,

OK if you believe that, but to me the logic is about as sound as the planned dumping/disposal of the $1 million dollars cache of nearly century old Jack Daniels whiskey just confiscated in Tennessee. It is a total lack of common sense. Besides, it the IAU's responsibility to fund the MPC, and they get help from Harvard (with the trillion dollar endowment) for their honorable management. Sheesh, no wonder it was so hard to publish the solution to Poincare's Conjecture for three dimensions and good research is so hard to come by on the Internet and vigorously copyrighted by groups like the IAU. What ever happened to the days I could tell a scientist I was interested in his research and he would mail me a bulk envelope filled with any and all of his reprints worldwide free of charge in exchange for one's enthusiasm. You'd think the Internet would have made this easier, not harder. whimper and out.

Best wishes,
Doug
----- Original Message ----- From: "E.P. Grondine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 4:05 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] MPC republishing restrictions


Hi Doug -

The reason the MPC has this policy is because it needs
the money raised by subscriptions to operate.

In my opinion, it is a nearly criminal the way NASA
has handled the impact hazard, most recently
flaunting the Congress in the way it responded to the
George Brown Ammendment, and Griffin should be fired.

E.P. Grondine
Man and Impact in the Americas






____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to