On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:43:31 -0500, you wrote: > >I'd bet that because his story was widely published at the time and my follow >up >investigation was also published telling the readers why it wasn't a meteorite
I'm just suprised that there was a follow-up at all. Much more typical for news media to report on the "meteorite" and never mention later that it was garbage. ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
