--- PolandMET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dean
> You have the same as my NWA 2826 LL5 (aka NWA 2053
> and many others)
> This is very good material, fresh, with many
> interesting inclusions, visible
> chondrules (thats why it should be LL5 not LL6) and
> very very large
> troilites (well visible on photos at rusty spots)
>
I think that you have just pointed out a problem in
general with classifying meteorites.
The piece that I sent in for classification wasnt
nearly as nice as the larger cut in my photo. I didnt
realize that it was so nice until yesterday when I
started cutting it up. If I had used a different
sample I would probably have gotten the different
classification.
Sincerely
DEAN
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
