Walter & All, Agreed, though "nice" might easily be taken to include "with integrity." As it stands today, McCartney is correct to say "good luck proving that [so-and-so] had prior knowledge they were selling NWA junk" as something of significant provenance. Again, were IMCA to establish enough power over time by virtue of the value of their authority, they would be able to deny membership to sellers who could not or would not provide proper evidence of provenance for certain types of specimens. Maybe a pipe dream, maybe not. But "playing nice," it seems to me, does not include sitting on the sidelines only to watch something which may be detrimental to this field unfold (and for which apparently zero counter-evidence has been provided after repeated requests) without question by SOMEone or SOME body of authority. Of course this is just one guy's opinion... Dave
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walter Branch Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit >This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice. Well said, McCartney. -Walter Branch ________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: "McCartney Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:00 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit > Yes, there was a lawsuit against Bob Evans brought by me. It was in > regards to a trade that was partially done, where I sent material and only > received a partial trade, then Evans went quiet. No contact for many > months. Eventually, I posted about it and received many replies that he > has done this before. His modus operandi is usually to go quiet and not > communicate. Which is what he's doing now. > > He did not show in court, I received a default judgment by the judge. > Evans did not appeal and a judgment was issued. I spent the money to have > the judgment filed in Illinois and a lien filed against his house. At > this time he can not purchase or sell, or inherit real property until the > judgment is paid. It is collecting 8% interest at this time. > > If I recall my contract law correctly, selling NWA junk as Zulu Queen > would be 'Misrepresentation' as well as Unjust Enrichment. Selling Zulu > Queen that he didn't know was NWA junk is simply 'Mutual > Misunderstanding'. Good luck in proving he had prior knowledge it was NWA > junk. > > This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice. > > -mt > > -------- Original Message -------- >> From: AL Mitterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:36 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] It was intuition ? OK ? >> >> Greetings List Members, >> >> On June 24th 2004 there were some claims made against the person in >> question. Apparently there was a lawsuit against this seller. I have >> stayed clear of him ever since, though I never dealt with him. I suggest >> people look up the archives and do their own reading and decide for >> themselves. It may be the issue was resolved but I guess my feeling is >> how it got to that point in the first place. Best! >> >> --AL Mitterling >> > > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
