Hello

>  The real 
> motivation behind this government collaboration is the
> worry that 
> brazen nations (and there is never a shortage of these)
> might abuse 
> this "no-man's land" while other "well
> behaved nations" stood by and 
> got jealous, disadvantaged, or had their security
> threatened.  So the 
> countries agreed that military, disposal or commercial
> (i.e., mining, 
> harvesting flora or fauna) acivities by any treaty
> signatories was 
> mutually prohibited.

   Neuschwabenland is a case in point. Hitler wanted a commercial colony in 
Antarctica, so he staked out a claim in the Norwegian claim for his own regime. 
Fortunately for the ecology of Antarctica, he was distracted by the horrific 
war he started which made Europe a wasteland and cemetary. Without the 
Antarctic Treaty, surely other nations would be there with claims and schemes, 
perhaps, not regimes as bad as Hitler, but conflicted and unsound still. 
   I wonder what effect the spectre of Neuschwabenland had on the motivation 
behind the Antarctic treaty. Most of the politics of the late 20th century came 
out of the war. In some sense, it took 50 years to settle the damage.
   There are six other continents, and many--perhaps thousands-- meteorites are 
just sitting on places there waiting for your perusal, study, and admiration. 
Perhaps Antarctic Park can be left alone.

Francis Graham



   
   


      
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to