Good point Larry. But I can't understand why people are still carefully distinguishing between comets and Asteroids?, I think by now we can assume they are basically one and the same, and not some exotic different species. To me it's just that some rocks are more 'wet and oily' than others...
I'd find it very very hard to believe there are no pieces of comet in our collections. Best, Mark Ford -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 May 2008 03:09 To: Chris Peterson Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Observed lunar meteorite impacts hit 100 Hi Chris: If I remember correctly (probably an old estimate) about 10% of the NEOs are thought to have a cometary origin. Also, many asteroids do contain volatiles (20% or more by weight), just not as much as your "typical" comet. Larry On Wed, May 21, 2008 4:14 pm, Chris Peterson wrote: > Hi Mark- > > > There have been a few meteorites that some have speculated might be > related to showers. But most likely, none are. > > Nobody even really knows if asteroids and comets are all that different, > other than comets containing volatiles. Recently, it has been suggested > that a few objects we consider asteroids may in fact be burned out comets. > And nobody really knows if the rocky material in comets is > actually fragile at all. > > The best argument against shower-origin meteorites is velocity: most > shower members are simply traveling too fast to avoid burning up high in > the atmosphere. The few showers that have slow components also, for the > most part, are low activity- barely above the sporadic background. > > The way I'd start a serious investigation of this would be to compare > fall dates and times with low velocity showers. Where you have a match, it > might be worth trying to determine if witness reports of the fireball > suggest a direction that is at least reasonably consistent with the shower > radiant. > > Chris > > > ***************************************** > Chris L Peterson > Cloudbait Observatory > http://www.cloudbait.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 4:29 PM > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Observed lunar meteorite impacts hit 100 > > > >> This got me thinking... some of the lunar impacts are being attributed >> to well-known meteor showers. >> >> Are there any good candidates for (earthly) meteorites which may be >> part of such showers, and therefore potentially once part of the presumed >> parent body? I guess candidate criteria would be time of year and (at >> least rough visual) triangulation back to the radiant. >> >> Or as many/most showers are associated with comets rather than >> asteroids, is the material perhaps much more fragile and therefore less >> likely to reach the earth's surface? >> >> Mark >> > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us. Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] You should not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose nor disclose their contents to any other person. GENERAL STATEMENT: Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be monitored and communications carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. Registered address Rectory Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing, W Sussex BN15 0DP. Company No 1800317 ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
