We have an accepted cosmic airburst event in recent history -- has anyone found substantial numbers of nanodiamonds as a result of Tunguska? If (compared to 'normal' background quantities) more were found in that area and could be linked to the airburst/impact, that would help substantiate nanodiamond deposits as an indicator. For that matter, what about comparing it to other confirmed mega-impact areas? Do the impactite layers also contain elevated levels of iridium? There are other markers that could bolster this theory. Tracy Latimer
---------------------------------------- > Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:27:52 -0800 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] More on the Younger Dryas 'impact event' > > Hi - > > Dr. Morrison is being disingenious. If you have a fragmented comet, and we've > all seen them, then you end up with multiple comet fragments hitting - and > we've all seen that as well. > > I wonder what year the impactite layer from Sandusky with the blast killed > mega-fauna will actually get reported > > E.P. Grondine > Man and Impact in the Americas > >>Well balanced with an edge to the sympathetic. >>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7808171.stm > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list _________________________________________________________________ It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster. http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad1_122008 ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
