The second version has a substantially higher frequency so it's really hot on
metal.
John Wolfe's can pick up some gold basin L's and Palo Verde Mine L's that a GMT
can't.
He showed me some very nice specimen gold too.
With my Dad's Gold Bug Origional, I have found bird shot 8 inches deep, as loud
as a wistle.
Either one is good on meteorites but I would sugest paying for the version two.
[Erik]
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 23:57:23 -0700
> Subject: [meteorite-list] - Fisher Gold Bug owners?
>
> Greetings listees.
> I know some of you prefer to use the Fisher Gold Bug II metal detectors.
> I've been watching for a "pre-owned model" and what I'm wondering is...
> Is the difference between the Gold Bug II and the original subtle, or
> substantial?
> Should I bother with the original at a good price, or hold out for the newer
> model?
> Either way, this will be my first detector. Any advice would be highly
> appreciated.
> Thank you.
> Linton
>
> ______________________________________________
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list