Dear Marco:
I have been contacted ~30 times over the last year by someone at that
e-mail address who identifies himself as James Rice. He sends lots
of photos of things he identifies as "imbedded spherules," "lapilli,"
"fusion crust," and "widmanstatten" in his rocks, which he claims are
from Amsterdam. I urged him to get a chemical analysis of his
rocks. He did, and he is now combing the lunar literature. He has
found irrelevant similarities in concentrations of some trace
elements in his samples and some lunar meteorites. He completely
ignores my interpretation of his data - The composition is consistent
with massive iron oxide (hematite?) with a little quartz, limestone,
and maybe clay. I've told him several times that the rocks are not
meteorites. He's one of those guys who just keeps looking for
evidence in favor of his hypothesis while ignoring the evidence
against it. I don't respond to inquiries any more, so I guess that's
why he's contacted you!
Randy Korotev
At 10:04 26-06-09 Friday, you wrote:
Hi,
Anyone here getting mails from a 'Jude Noonan', e-mail [email protected] ?
He/she sent me pictures and apparent geochemical "descriptions" of a
stone, claimed to have been found in Amsterdam. He alternately
suggests it is an impact rock or a moon rock.
The whole is very fishy. However, in many ways it reminds me of that
Swedish dude Lindfors who naged us a while ago. So I wonder whether
he is at it again, under another name.
- Marco
-----
Dr Marco (asteroid 183294) Langbroek
Dutch Meteor Society (DMS)
e-mail: [email protected]
http://www.dmsweb.org
http://www.marcolangbroek.nl
-----
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
