Hello Peter,

Welcome to the list. Thanks for your contribution. 

It is nice to get a curator's perspective. I'm sure most if not all list 
members are envious of your job and support your work. 

I do feel you have not answered Martin's central argument that if laws 
prohibiting export were not in place your Australian colleagues would have far 
more material to study through dealer and collector contributions and trades.

As a humble private collector I like to think I am supporting (or at least not 
depriving) the public institutions' collections. I know many of the dealers I 
support with my purchases have donated or traded large amounts of material to 
public institutions. This may be simple rationalization, but I do feel Martin's 
numbers regarding finds in the US compared to Australia imply that we 
collectors are likely increasing rather than decreasing the amount of material 
available to these institutions. I would love to hear your thoughts about 
whether you feel this argument is valid. 

Best Wishes,
Jim Baxter


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Davidson" <p.david...@nms.ac.uk>
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 4:02:08 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: [meteorite-list] A Curator Replies

This is my first posting on this list - please be gentle with me. I have only 
been on the list a matter of a week or so and I seemed to have walked into a 
veritable storm. I would like to share my views with you as a curator. Please 
forgive this rather long mail.

 

Taking a posting from Martin Altmann dated 7th July as my starting point, here 
goes.

 

I have never heard a law being described as "exotic". Do you mean idiotic?

 

I can in no way speak on behalf of all curators, far less Australian ones. I 
can only give you my own viewpoint but I do know many curators from Australia, 
mostly mineralogists, and please believe me when I tell you they are fine 
people and not the narrow-minded, nationalistic people hinted at in a number of 
e-mails. I also noted that Martin Altmann stated that everybody on the list was 
a "lousy layman" which is not only patently untrue but just a little sexist. 
But I digress.

 

Curators are every bit as dedicated to their collections as private collectors 
are. We are not faceless bureaucrats (or similar) existing in some Kafkaesque 
nightmare world hidebound by rules, and seeking to restrict everyone else by 
creating a spider's web of red tape to trap the unwary. That notion is as 
ridiculous to me as the presumption that all dealers (minerals or meteorites) 
are shady and unscrupulous. As a curator at a National Museum, I am obligated 
by law (yes, I know!) to preserve and protect the collections of the museum and 
by extension, the nation. I choose to do this. I work in the museum because I 
want to. Every curator I have met shares with me a love of the specimens that 
they curate. We also share a passionate believe that it is our duty to bring 
our collections to the notice and attention of the public, and to make them 
available to researchers and other curators. Believe me when I tell you that 
museum curators/conservators are not well paid. We do it for love - well 
mostly. When I joined the museum in 1975, I also had to undertake never to 
start and build up my own collection. The collections of the museum ARE my 
collections.

 

I also feel that Martin overstates the influence scientist have at governmental 
level. Yes, some scientists are asked to advise on certain matters, but in the 
end it is the politician that decides. My observations of this hated group, 
politicians that is, leads me to surmise that if some short term political 
advantage can be gained by appealing to the masses, fed to satedness by a 
largely right-wing populist press (the tabloids in the UK), then they will 
always take that course of action, no matter what the consequences are. This 
very often goes against the advice of scientists/curators and negates many 
decades of good interaction between the public and private sectors. As I 
mineralogist, I am painfully aware that the market for display quality 
specimens has now passed beyond the reach of publicly-funded museums. The 
meteorite market is no different. 

 

Nonetheless, as a curator at a National Museum, and I hope you can understand 
this point of view, there is a duty to collect for the Nation everything we can 
in order that we can research, interpret and explain to the people of Scotland, 
its historical, sociological, artistic and scientific heritage. The question 
raised by many contributors to the list is: should meteorites fall into that 
category? Clearly the Australian Government thought so, and so did the UK 
Government in the 1960's when legislation was introduced to Parliament but 
never passed into law.

 

We already do our utmost to protect other geological sites. This policy is well 
intentioned and it can be argued that "fixed" geological outcrops, either 
mineralogical or palaeontological are a finite resource. If unscrupulous 
collectors plunder the site and remove all the material, then it is lost 
forever. Meteorites are different in that they are not "fixed" but are random 
in the sense that they can fall at any time, in any place. However, from my 
point of view as a curator, ought I to have the desire to possess in the 
National Collection, a sample of each of the four Scottish falls? I do have 
that desire and the fact that the museum doesn't possess all Scottish 
meteorites leads to a feeling of both consternation and frustration. But it is 
a situation I accept

 

Why don't you go and collect them yourself I hear you asking. Well, the short 
answer is - we would love to. We do go on collecting trips, but these are 
limited by budgetary constraints primarily, but also by the general workload 
faced by all curators. This is why we have tried to build a network of private 
collectors across the country that will work with is to the benefit of both 
parties. But the inescapable fact is that the market in geological specimens 
has moved onto a level which museums find it difficult to operate in. We rely 
to a large extent on donations or possibly exchange. Private collectors know 
that they can sell their specimens on the open market and receive a much better 
price than a museum can offer.

 

I was heartened to hear that some private collectors and dealers are in favour 
of a greater collaboration with scientists and museums. All of us who love 
meteorites need to continue to work closely. We require the raw material to 
undertake research, and this gets fed back to the public through our 
publications. Scientists do find new information in old specimens; we would not 
be scientists if we did not constantly search for new data. But I would just 
like to finish with this thought. Many young people are familiar with 
meteorites through the media and the internet, but for many, the only 
opportunity they get to see and touch them is through museums and their 
curators. Many indeed of the list members may have been inspired to go and 
collect by seeing meteorites in a museum.

 

Martin. Please do not take this as a personal attack. I find your e-mails well 
agued and thoughtful. Indeed it was your email that inspired me to pen this 
message. I have spoken about this in other lists, in other places. The 
meteorites will continue to fall, long after we are all gone. There should be 
enough for everyone.

 

Don't forget us! 

 

All donations gratefully accepted.

Peter Davidson
Curator of Minerals
 
National Museums Collection Centre
National Museums Scotland
242 West Granton Road
Edinburgh
EH5 1JA
Phone: +44 131 247 4283
p.david...@nms.ac.uk
www.nms.ac.uk
 
 


Garden Detectives. Unearthing nature’s little secrets. 26 Jun – 27 Sep. 
Admission free: www.nms.ac.uk/garden

National Museums Scotland, Scottish Charity, No. SC 011130

This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the 
addressee please inform the sender and delete the email from your system. The 
statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and 
do not necessarily reflect those of National Museums Scotland. This message is 
subject to the Data Protection Act 1998 and Freedom of Information (Scotland) 
Act 2002. No liability is accepted for any harm that may be caused to your 
systems or data by this message.
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to