Backing up and extending what Alan said, in current usage, a slash means one of two things: 1) there are properties of this meteorite that are intermediate or transitional between the two classes, or 2) The classifier could not decide which group it was due to some kind of limitation in methodology or samples. In the case of Holbrook, it is the first meaning. A variety of properties have been measured that put Holbrook near the L/LL boundary, including O isotopes and metal composition.

So what does that mean? Nobody knows. Either the L and LL asteroids had overlapping properties, in which case we don't know which was originally home to Holbrook, or there are other asteroids with intermediate properties that could be the parent of Holbrook.

The L and LL groups are not particularly well resolved from each other in many properties, although it is certain they are not all from one asteroid. I am confident that quite a number of classified L chondrites are from the LL body and vice versa, and not just limited to the ones that are called L/LL.
Jeff

Dave Gheesling wrote:
Bernd, Alan, and List,
Thank you both for the diplomatic and informative responses.  While we're on
the subject, might one of you (or anyone else) expand on, say, the L/LL6
classification designation?  Holbrook was recently moved from an L6 to such
a classification, and I have a few others in my collection which are not
breccias (and presumably are entirely from one parent body and not two) but
yet have this classification assigned to them...which, "by definition,"
would imply connection with both the L and LL parent bodies, presumably
anyway.
Thanks, and all best,
Dave
www.fallingrocks.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 12:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [meteorite-list] Chondritic parent bodies

Hello Dave, Alan, and List,

Here is a paper that may be of interest with regard to LL chondrite parent
bodies:

Dixon E.T., Bogard D.D. and Garrison D.H. (2002) 40Ar-39Ar Chronology of LL
Chondrites (Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIII, 1114.pdf).

They even discuss *three* models:

1. The onion-shell model
2. The rubble-pile model
3. The re-assembly model


Best wishes,

Bernd



______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



--
Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman       phone: (703) 648-6184
US Geological Survey          fax:   (703) 648-6383
954 National Center
Reston, VA 20192, USA


______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to