Sorry for my poorly formed query.
I certainly did not mean that we'd include meteoroids that were so small that 
they completely burned up before becoming meteorites on the surface. I figured 
that was a given.

My mistake.

Yes and I did try to be a bit subtle in my query and ask about an ordinary 
chondrite instead of an Ureilite just to make the back of the envelope 
calculations easier. I am assuming someone somewhere has tested actual 
chondritic material in a hypersonic plasma tunnel to measure the exact amount 
of ablation and possibly someone here knew that result. That way it wouldn't be 
a guess but an actual measurement. Now that I've thought about it some more I 
know someone who may have already performed that experiment, so I'll contact 
him...

Too me, 99.9% seems to me to be an excessive amount of loss due to ablation and 
disintegration, but maybe I'm wrong. Anyway, even if you use that number, with 
2008 TC3 "weighing" an estimated 72,600 kilos before entry. 99.9% loss would 
mean there is still about 65 kilos of material on the ground in the Sudan that 
has not yet been recovered.

--
Richard Kowalski
http://fullmoonphotography.net
IMCA #1081



      
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to