My Response Jan 27, 2010

Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Regmaglypts 

Jason and All,

1.  My reference to “bubbles” is to morphology, NOT voids.  Another meteoritic 
example of “bubble morphology effects” is pallasitic olivines such as 
Springwater and Imilac.

A thought experiment: Once again, envision a melt mass of olivine and 
nickel-iron solidifying under microgravity conditions – surface energy 
dominates gravity.  

On cooling, olivine begins to solidify before nickel-iron. However, since 
olivine and iron-nickel share a range of temperatures where both are still at 
least partially liquid (mushy stage), as cooling continues, still-plastic 
olivines can be surrounded by and sometimes infiltrated and pushed apart by 
liquid nickel-iron.  

Cut and polished sections of Springwater and Imilac reveal this as a relatively 
complex process.  Observe 120 angles between some olivines, evidence of a 
system governed by surface energy.  Some olivine boundaries are straight 
(interior polyhedral shapes); some are circular (a sphere minimizes surface 
area to volume ratio); some straight and curved (perhaps on the outer surface 
of the olivine mass). See my "Stepping Back in Time" article in Meteorite 
magazine Nov. 2003, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 21-22 or see it in the publications list 
on my website at http://meteormetals.com

2.  There is NO WAY that the thermal history of a metal can be calculated in 
reverse, despite hundreds of papers in the meteoritics literature since the 
original paper of Osmond and Cartaud in 1904 and the more recent, detailed 
papers on “metallographic cooling rates!”  That is more than 100 years of 
circular reasoning!  Industrial metallurgists would be a lot happier if this 
backward calculation were possible.  It is NOT! 

3.  Speaking of industrial metallurgists, do another experiment: show a cut 
section of any nickel-iron or stony iron meteorite to a modern INDUSTRIAL 
metallurgist.  Ask him or her to describe the microstructure, without you 
giving them any “meteorite words” or concepts.  Then, Listen!  Next, give that 
person one of the metallic meteorite papers in the meteoritics literature 
(other than mine) and see if that person can even understand the language and 
concepts.  Meteoritics metallurgy has sealed itself inside an old language, not 
accessible to today’s busy, industrial metallurgists.  To quote one of my 
industrial metallurgist friends who is a casting expert and who has become a 
meteorite collector, "meteorite metallurgy is in the Stone Age."

We need a NEW METALLURGY for meteorites!  Imagine what we could learn!

Phyllis Budka
http://meteormetals.com/

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to