Without seeming to endlessly argue with the data presented. I would like
to point out the the sharpness examples in the link you provided are
taken from a VERY small percentage of the overall image. In relation to
the entire photo taken as a whole the sharpness of the image is
comparable at any given area over an "average".
Macro meteorite photography works the same way, and I would bet that 99%
of people who view any photo don't look at such a small section of the
entire photo. This is fine when shopping for a lens, but for most
photos, frankly it does not matter much. Especially when talking about
web galleries of images at 72 DPI. Now when talking about print
resolution and sharpness that's a whole other topic. ;)
Regards,
Eric
On 1/27/2010 11:49 AM, Dark Matter wrote:
Sorry, but it won't. The measures are small, but the optical physics are real.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/50-comparison/f-stops.htm
Best,
Martin
Eric wrote:
An f/2.8 lens focused
properly with the right settings will be just as sharp in the given DOF of a
comparable photo/subject photographed at a slower/smaller f/22 aperture.
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
