Darren, I would have to agree with you on that NWA 869 would have been a massive light show 4,400 years ago (Thank you everyone :) that answer my question) because it represents one of the largest finds in the Saharan desert. The total weight so far that has been recovered is about 7 metric tons which comes to about 15,432.3584 pounds. It is said that before entry, NWA 869 was about 120-230 metric tons, which means that 90% to 95% of the mass was lost due to ablation during atmopheric passage. That would have been a sight to see, sun glasses anyone?
Shawn Alan [meteorite-list] Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr Darren Garrison cynapse at charter.net Tue Mar 23 01:46:31 EDT 2010 Previous message: [meteorite-list] Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr Next message: [meteorite-list] Fw: Re: Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:07:59 -0700 (PDT), you wrote: > terrestrial age is consistent with the low degree of weathering >(W1). I am guessing 4.4 kyr means 4.4 years from the low level BTW, if 869 had fallen just 4.4 years before it was found, there would be camels that are still running today. The light show from that entry had to be MASSIVE. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Previous message: [meteorite-list] Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr Next message: [meteorite-list] Fw: Re: Question about terrestrial age of 4.4 kyr Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
