Hello Greg,
I've always loved science, but I do think that some in the scientific
community tend to stretch things a bit thin sometimes. All kinds of theories
about all kinds of things are thrown around with little to support them. This
reminds me of a quote by Mark Twain. The quote follows:
"There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact."
Something to think about....
Greg Lindh
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 20:51:24 -0400
> CC: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of Angrites"
> for sale -...
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Isn't 'science' just that, "Science"... Ever evolving as ground truth
> comes in? Without open minds and hard work by many dedicated
> individuals, 'science' would not get very far, especially in the world
> of meteortitics! Much of the initial work and/or thoughts are educated
> suggestions which are meant to excite others in rational and sometimes
> heated discussions, no matter what scientific focus is being
> discussed. I won't even bring up the evolution talks of the past...
>
> Best Regards,
> Greg Hupe
>
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 8:00 AM, "Rose, David MD" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree with Jeff completely. Same thing happens in Medicine. And
>> even when the data is peer reviewed, that doesn't mean that it is
>> rock solid truth. It's a process of continual evaluation and
>> refinement.
>>
>> David
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:meteorite-
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Grossman
>> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:40 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Its official! NWA 6291 "The King of
>> Angrites" for sale -...
>>
>> Yikes! Abstracts to meetings are not peer reviewed!
>>
>> jeff
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/2010 10:05 PM, Adam Hupe wrote:
>>> Hi Jason and List,
>>>
>>> I do not refute Melinda Hutson's article that was never peer
>>> reviewed and
>>> contains several errors according to the classifying scientists. I
>>> asked
>>> scientists about the article and they stated, it is obvious that
>>> she didn't read
>>> the original peer reviewed abstract carefully, even mistaking the
>>> type of
>>> petrology that was discussed using formulas that simply do not
>>> apply to the
>>> texture NWA 2999 exhibits.
>>>
>>> There were several prestigious coauthors listed in the original
>>> paper; Unique
>>> Angrite NWA 2999: The Case For Samples From Mercury.
>>>
>>> Who am I to argue with the world's best? I will keep an open mind
>>> and hope for
>>> some ground truth that will hopefully settle it once and for all.
>>> I think the
>>> authors were making a point of having an open mind and that the
>>> subject should
>>> be debated possibly stimulated more scientific interest in
>>> Angrites. It took a
>>> long time to win over the scientific community that some of these
>>> meteorites
>>> were actually from Mars. It was debated to death and now nobody
>>> argues about
>>> the Shergottite parent body any more.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Adam
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Visit the Archives at
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> P Please consider the impact to the environment before printing this
>> email.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> P Please consider the impact to the environment before printing this
>> email.
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
