Richard, Anne, List, This has a lot of us smoking right now. I am pressing send anyway here. Sorry. The truly sad thing about this is that Anne herself is the one who claimed in an earlier email that Tony did in fact have some of NWA 5363 already. She went on to tell us all to be patient. This after she was made fully aware that Dr Jambon as a qualified scientist, had already confirmed the pairing with NWA 5400. This is his exact quote " NWA 5363 is undoubtedly paired with NWA 5400" In the same email Dr. Jambon went on to say that; " I have been insulted. My Moroccan partners have been insulted too. We all wait for apology". Although at this time I think he might have been referring to Greg. Unless I missed it. Nobody has yet offered any kind of apology or even an explanation of why they would insult him. I can't help but wonder why a board member of the IMCA would continue to insult a very important scientist in our field? It seems to me an IMCA board member would try to do all they can to keep from alienating and insulting our scientists. Anne what if some day the IMCA needs a favor from Dr. Jambon? Did you ever think of that? Sorry Anne but, you are way out of line here because I personally made sure you got a copy of Dr. Jambons email to this list. Look it up yourself in archives from June 23rd, 2010 in an email posted by Zelimer Gabelica with the subject; Pairings to NWA 5400. Or I can email it to you again if you'd like. As far as I am concerned this matter has been settled since that email date and I would like to offer Dr. Jambon my personal apologies for not asking Anne to cool her guns until now. Anne please cool your guns and respect Dr. Jambon's work. It has been stated all along that all of this material originated from Mbarek. There was really no reason to believe it was ever anything but paired. Carl
-- Carl or Debbie Esparza Meteoritemax ---- Richard Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting Anne. > And sad. > > I was under the impression that he was sent samples of NWA 5363 over two > months ago. At least that is what I was assured in a private email by another > party. > > I was hoping to see a satisfactory resolution to this controversy some time > soon, but I guess it isn't to be. Ah well. It must have gotten lost in the > mail. > > -- > Richard Kowalski > Full Moon Photography > IMCA #1081 > > > --- On Thu, 8/19/10, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA 6292 2.110 gram > > To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > > [email protected], [email protected] > > Date: Thursday, August 19, 2010, 5:43 PM > > Right. > > We all need to be patient, and let the experts do their > > work. > > > > However, last time I talked to Tony Irving, he still did > > not have a > > specimen of NWA 5363. > > So if anyone of you would be willing to help be providing a > > piece of it it > > certainly would be very nice. It does not need to be a big > > fragment, a few > > grams would probably do. > > > > And if you do have some NWA 5363, please contact me off > > List. > > Thank you. > > > > Anne M. Black > > _http://www.impactika.com/_ (http://www.impactika.com/) > > [email protected]_ > > (mailto:[email protected]) > > > > Vice-President, I.M.C.A. Inc. > > _http://www.imca.cc_ (http://www.imca.cc) > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
