Dear Friends,

A new paper about the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis
has been published. Associated with it are a number of
comments, both pro and con, about it. The paper is:

Holliday, V. T., and D. J. Meltzer, 2010, The 12.9-ka ET 
Impact Hypothesis and North American Paleoindians.
Current Anthropology. vol. 51, pp. 575–607 (Oct. 2010)
0011-3204/2010/5105-0002
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/656015
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/656015

The Current Anthropology press release about the above 
paper can be found at:

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/story/10.1086/pr.2010.09.29.3011

Comments about this paper is “No Evidence For Clovis 
Comet Catastrophe, Archaeologists Say” by Alton 
Parrish at:

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/195/688/No_Evidence_For_Clovis_Comet_Catastrophe,_Archaeologists_Say.html

Yours,

Paul H.
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to