Jeff was kind to write me privately, but it should be more widely noted I 
misread his entry....



Begin forwarded message:

> From: Jeff Grossman <[email protected]>
> Date: December 29, 2010 10:05:13 AM EST
> To: Darryl Pitt <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Asian falls
> 
> You misunderstood that parameter... it's a reason why find statistics are a 
> poor measure of what falls.  
> 
> Jeff
> 
> On 12/29/2010 9:43 AM, Darryl Pitt wrote:
>> 
>> Terrific work!  Thank your for this ongoing effort (and more) and I'm 
>> appreciative you've brought this to my attention. 
>> 
>> To speculate in response to your query:  I'll go with what is currently a 
>> small statistical sample.  Let's revisit in 10 years.  ;-)
>> 
>> Separately, I respectfully disagree with parameter #5 as a delimiting 
>> constraint on Fall Statistics:  "Many meteorites are found by people who 
>> sell meteorites... valuable, rare types become known to science quickly, 
>> while those of low value may never be described."
>> 
>> It would seem to me we've entered an era where every fall, regardless of 
>> type or circumstance, is now a highly sought-after commodity and can be 
>> readily monetized---and for previously unheard of sums. Never before have we 
>> experienced so many falls reported by the media and pursued by hunters to 
>> the....ends of the Earth.  
>> 
>> Again, thanks so much, Jeff. 
>> 
>> 
>> I would also like to take this opportunity to wish everyone a Happy, Healthy 
>> and altogether wonderful New Year. 
>> 
>> 
>> All the best,
>> 
>> Darryl
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:40 PM, Jeff Grossman wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> List,
>>> 
>>> I've been maintaining the Wikipedia page on meteorites fall statistics for 
>>> a number of years:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meteorite_fall_statistics
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On this page is a table showing the number of falls by continent, divided 
>>> into 20-year intervals.  We are now halfway through the 2001-2020 interval, 
>>> and fall rates in most places are about what you'd expect based on the 
>>> previous 40 years.  However, Asian falls are way down... there have been 13 
>>> published in MetBull for the last 10 years, around half the number you 
>>> might expect.  Anybody care to speculate why this is?
>>> 
>>> Jeff
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> Visit the Archives at 
>>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>> 
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> 
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> 
> 

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to