Why not just slice them up, flood the market with large slices to drive the 
price down, that way we can ALL afford a huge slice, and give them their 25%?? 
If there are that many stones floating around would that not be an option?? 
That way people that have always wanted a nice big slice could afford one. I 
have always been told it "was better to make a fast nickel than a slow dime". I 
am sure if the price was down around .25 to .50/gr people would be buying them 
like crazy. 

Stuart McD

---- Jason Utas <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Wouldn't the signed contracts dictate that Steve only return 25% of
> what was found?  Since the agreement was 25/75 (mentioned in the
> video), the issue, it seems, could be entirely settled if Steve turned
> 25% of the finds over to the landowners.  If the money's not there, it
> seems to me like that would be the quickest and easiest means of
> settling the dispute.
> Unless there's some reason for Steve to hold on to it all even though
> he can't sell it at present...that would seem to be the easiest
> solution.  I see no reason not to do that, aside from the fact that
> the farmers wouldn't necessarily be getting money for their rocks.
> But since it doesn't look like they're getting any anyway, at least
> they'd have less reason to think they'd been cheated, which is clearly
> the case given what was said in the video.
> Jason
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:38 AM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Bill, Phil, list,
> > It sounds like you and Phil are saying the same thing. Albeit in totally 
> > diligent ways. I hate to say this but many of us agree with both of you.
> > Since Picasso, tiffany's and Lindsay Lohan are not too likely to become 
> > partners in this venture. The venture may indeed turn out to be a flop.
> > I said it earlier that I know Steve has tried marketing these space gems. 
> > But, it sounds like what I am hearing is that time is ticking and since the 
> > de Beers had two things lacking here. Mega bucks and  a monopoly on 
> > virtually all of the worlds diamond caches.
> > This seems to NOT be the case with Steve and his cartel.
> > By Steve's own admission the money is tight.  Others are already competing 
> > for sales of these gems that they possess. And nobody is buying them.
> > Who could blame them? The potential for fake stones is uncontrollable. 
> > Everything on the planet is being faked today and when you can fake 
> > something with as little as a piece of paper. Well, this is simply to easy 
> > to fake. With trust now at the forefront, how do we know these stones came 
> > from meteorites? Please. I trust Steve and know him to be honest but, you 
> > cannot depend on that in the real world.
> > I feel for this whole group because as I said before they are all good 
> > people but, unless De Beers bails them out or they change the game plan and 
> > sell meteorites. Nothing short of a miracle is going to save this venture.
> > They say in Hollywood that any press is good press so. this may be good for 
> > the show but looking at the big picture. IMHO this should end as quickly as 
> > possible.
> > Carl
> > Carl or Debbie Esparza
> > Meteoritemax
> >
> >
> > ---- bill kies <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Steve,
> >>
> >> If I'm correct, you're saying the deal was a flop and everyone has to take 
> >> a gig. Disclaimers like this might help divert blame in the business world 
> >> but where does this leave humble collectors with no agenda other than the 
> >> desire to pick up a few space rocks when the rare opportunity presents 
> >> itself? Surely you remember those days, even though you aren't a 
> >> collector, as they were not all that long ago.
> >>
> >> Maybe you should return all the material you can. Try to make these people 
> >> happy and live up to the respect you convinced them you were worthy of.
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >> > To: [email protected]; 
> >> > [email protected]; 
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > From: [email protected]
> >> > Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 04:26:35 +0000
> >> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The Trials and Tribulations in Dealing 
> >> > withLando wners
> >> >
> >> > Hello List,
> >> >
> >> > Wow, what an outpouring of comments today.
> >> >
> >> > Let me bring all of you up to speed on this.
> >> >
> >> > Five years ago, I partnered with around 10 or so friends and they 
> >> > combined some money, and I offered up some time and we started hunting 
> >> > for meteorites together. We choose to go to a certain location in Kansas 
> >> > where pallasites had been found in the past.
> >> >
> >> > We chose this location after I had my success locating some pallasite 
> >> > meteorites at the Brenham strewnfield.
> >> > We got land leases to hunt, without any promise of any big money, no 
> >> > talk of Millions, or thousands or even hundreds of dollars to anyone. We 
> >> > just started hunting and we started finding meteorites. Some of my 
> >> > friends, at least 8 of us in the group, were very connected meteorite 
> >> > dealers and we decided to try to sell some of our finds, we tried and we 
> >> > tried and we tried, and we sold one meteorite. We contacted virtually 
> >> > all the institutions with notable meteorite collections and none of them 
> >> > wanted to either buy or to trade for any of our specimens. The one sale 
> >> > was made, and the land owner from where this meteorite came from got his 
> >> > contracted percentage royalty, and he was VERY pleased. It was truly 
> >> > money from heaven for him.
> >> >
> >> > The meteorites from this particular location have the reputation of 
> >> > being the worst rusting meteorites known to man. Far worse than Campo, 
> >> > Nantan, Brenham or any other "ruster" one can think of. So we could 
> >> > understand why no one wanted to buy any more of this meteorite. It was 
> >> > just too big of a risk for people to take.
> >> >
> >> > As we kept finding more and more meteorites, we were challenged with the 
> >> > supply and demand issue. Much supply, virtually no demand. Not a good 
> >> > outlook.
> >> >
> >> > Then one of the dealers in the group reminded us of the high quality 
> >> > gemstones that had been faceted from the peridot in this meteorite. So 
> >> > we took the specimen in the worst condition out of our inventory and 
> >> > practiced trying to free up some of the olivine that was in it, and sure 
> >> > enough, there were some amazing gemstones produced.
> >> >
> >> > A year and a half ago, we went to all the land owners where we had found 
> >> > meteorites and told them that if we would liquidate all the meteorites 
> >> > we found, we probably would only get $0.10 or $0.15 per gram. But we 
> >> > felt that as gemstones, we could make more money for everyone.
> >> >
> >> > We decided to incorporate our partnership as Palladot Inc, a Kansas 
> >> > corporation, that focused on selling meteorites, mostly in gemstone 
> >> > format.
> >> > I am the President, and Jason Phillips is our C.E.O.. We hired Charles 
> >> > Ellias, who is a graduate gemologist with 25 years of experience in the 
> >> > color gemstone market, to manage our operations, including overseeing 
> >> > the faceting, grading and pricing and marketing of the gemstones.
> >> >
> >> > Our original contract only promised the landowners that they would earn 
> >> > their royalty on the "wholesale" sale of the meteorites. We told all the 
> >> > land owners we wanted to pursue the gemstone market as there was very 
> >> > little demand in the meteorite world for the specimens as meteorites. It 
> >> > was one of the landowners that actually suggested "pooling" all of the 
> >> > royalties together, so we wouldn't have to melt down every meteorite, 
> >> > and this way all the landowners could still share proportionately by 
> >> > their contribution in the profits.
> >> >
> >> > It was at that point, that in the spirit of full discloser, we explained 
> >> > how the gemstone market gave us the best up-side potential for earnings. 
> >> > If a market could be built for these most amazing and rare gemstones 
> >> > with a fascinating story, then we would have the supply to fill the 
> >> > demand created. And yes, IF there would be millions of dollars of demand 
> >> > created, we would have millions of dollars of gems.
> >> >
> >> > All of the land owners, except for one, agreed to pool their royalty 
> >> > interest together and join us in the gem market.
> >> > The one landowner that didn't want to go to the gem business with us, 
> >> > was happy to take his portion "in kind" and we gave him his meteorites. 
> >> > All the others signed a new agreement that pooled their royalties 
> >> > together.
> >> >
> >> > One year ago this month, we started selling Palldot Pallasitic Peridot 
> >> > gemstones at the Tucson show (specificially at the Pueblo Show at the 
> >> > Executive Inn.) It seems we chose the worst year, economically speaking, 
> >> > since the Great Depression to start a business...not to mention, a 
> >> > business in the luxury jewelry market.
> >> > But we still made some sales, and our business is growing.
> >> >
> >> > Now, back a year and a half ago, the deal we made was that we would 
> >> > share the royalty to the landowners based on the retail profits rather 
> >> > than on the wholesale sales. The landowner who was featured in this 
> >> > local TV story we are all talking about, actually had his attorney look 
> >> > over the new pooling agreement. In fact, his attorney made some 
> >> > suggestions to alter it, and we agreed to his suggested changes.
> >> >
> >> > There NEVER was any promise of "getting rich quick." Never. Getting rich 
> >> > over time...maybe, if we played our cards right.
> >> >
> >> > But we did state that the sale of just a few gemstones could yield more 
> >> > money than the whole meteorite could fetch on its own.
> >> >
> >> > So, for the last several months, this one landowner has been trying to 
> >> > get Jason and me to "alter his contract." If it were just a matter of 
> >> > making him happy, there wouldn't be a problem. BUT there are ALL the 
> >> > other landowners that we are in binding contracts with. We would make 
> >> > the others very mad if we gave into this one man's demands at their 
> >> > expense.
> >> >
> >> > Of course, if we were in breach of contract, there would be legal 
> >> > remedies this man could take. But we aren't in breach of the contract so 
> >> > he chose to threaten us with going to the investigative reporter at a TV 
> >> > station with his story. We discussed some options that we could offer 
> >> > him, and still keep the other land owners happy, but they were not what 
> >> > he wanted, so he went to the reporter anyway.
> >> >
> >> > At the start, I think the reporter thought there was this huge story, 
> >> > but I spent nearly two hours of interviews with her, and when she heard 
> >> > my side, the only thing she had left for her story was that this one 
> >> > landowner was "not happy" that he hadn't seen any profits yet.
> >> >
> >> > Well, I am "not happy" that we haven't seen any profits either!
> >> >
> >> > But we are doing the best we can.
> >> >
> >> > We are making sales, and when there are profits, the stockholders will 
> >> > get dividends and the landowners will get royalties.
> >> >
> >> > We have invested over $100,000 and somewhere north of 3,000 man hours 
> >> > into this one project. This landowner has invested zero dollars, and 
> >> > zero hours. There are a lot of other people that have far more invested, 
> >> > and we ALL want to see a return. He will be entitled to his share when 
> >> > profits are generated just as he agreed to a year and a half ago.
> >> >
> >> > Now, let me also remind you that news reporters don't care about telling 
> >> > the whole story. They only had a few minutes for the segment, and while 
> >> > I share all of this with the reporter, she (and her editors) decided to 
> >> > run the story for ratings purposes. Because, everyone I have talked to 
> >> > said this really is a "non-story." Millions of people everyday are not 
> >> > happy with contracts they entered into in the past. It isn't news. 
> >> > Nowhere in the contract does it say that each landowner "has to be 
> >> > happy." In fact, that is why you have contracts, because, inevitably, 
> >> > people often become less than happy with the deals they struck over time.
> >> >
> >> > Meanwhile, we have an obligation to our shareholders, and to the 
> >> > landowners to press on and do our best to make all of us as much money 
> >> > as we can. It might be sad if what we are doing was hurting science, but 
> >> > to be honest, if there wasn't the potential for profit with the 
> >> > gemstones, we would have quit hunting a long time ago, and a lot of 
> >> > these rocks would still be underground rusting away anyway.
> >> >
> >> > I know this explanation won't make everyone happy, but I have learned a 
> >> > long time ago that it isn't my job to make everyone happy.
> >> >
> >> > I just do the best I can with the hand I am dealt.
> >> >
> >> > Feel free to contact me off the list if you have any further questions.
> >> >
> >> > Steve Arnold
> >> > President, Palladot Inc
> >> > Co-Host Meteorite Men
> >> > ArnoldMeteorites.com
> >> >
> >> > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
> >> > ______________________________________________
> >> > Visit the Archives at 
> >> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> >> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >> ______________________________________________
> >> Visit the Archives at 
> >> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> >> Meteorite-list mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> > ______________________________________________
> > Visit the Archives at 
> > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> > Meteorite-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> >
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

--
Stuart McDaniel
Lawndale, NC
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to