> Retail price guides and auction results have a very real and useful place in 
> any collectibles market, especially for a market as small and thin as the 
> meteorite market.


I completely agree with this sentiment.  How is it that a guide (with 
appropriate caveats included) cannot be of benefit to the collector/buyer?   If 
only to reveal the relative differences in valuation between different 
meteorites.  Conceptually, I love the word "guide" and all that it implies, and 
I think it's a laudable exercise.  






On Feb 25, 2011, at 9:32 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Hi Richard
> Seems we just completely disagree.  I won't reiterate my points again, but we 
> have survived in this hobby for several decades since the first large dealers 
> began without a price guide and survived quite well. If there is a place for 
> a guide then why hasn't one stuck over that time period? There have been 
> several attempts before Kevin, with no success.  Again the collecting market 
> can determine the need for a guide.
> 
> Why not do your own pricing? Kevin admits he doesn't use auctions ad doesn't 
> know what the dealers SOLD items for.  To me a guide like that is not useful. 
> REALIZED prices may be ok, but good luck getting those data from dealers.
> 
> 
> Matt
> ------------------------
> Matt Morgan
> Mile High Meteorites
> http://www.mhmeteorites.com
> P.O. Box 151293
> Lakewood, CO 80215
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Kowalski <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:20:02 
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Retail & Auction Price Guides
> 
> Sorry for making another subject change on this Kevin & Matt.
> 
> I have to argue directly against you one this one Matt.
> 
> Retail price guides and auction results have a very real and useful place in 
> any collectibles market, especially for a market as small and thin as the 
> meteorite market.
> 
> While I do not have Kevin's price guide, I certainly think it is something 
> useful. Auction results are a very important tool too.
> 
> Nearly everyone on this list who spoke up not too long ago when asked about 
> interests other than meteorites said they collect some thing or other. Many 
> of these collectors collected coins and notes, numisma. Since this is the 
> first collecting bug tat bit me too, I'll discuss this market in those terms.
> 
> Coins, tokens, notes, etc is a huge market, but value is assigned by the 
> numerous points already raised and more, but are always dictated by supply 
> and demand. Many relatively common coins are very valuable because so many 
> collectors desire them while vast areas of numismatics, which are rather 
> esoteric, may only have a few hundred of even just one or a few collectors 
> worldwide. That is a type of market the we find ourselves in.
> 
> I've had a number of you with customer lists privately estimate for me the 
> worldwide number of active meteorite collectors and the consensus seems to be 
> well under 1000. Many estimate the number to be around 500. Double or maybe 
> triple that and you have the total number of active and sporadic collectors. 
> Adam Hupe often points out how rare meteorites are and that is very true. The 
> flip side of that is the meteorite collector base is minuscule. Just in those 
> small areas of numismatics many insanely rare, beautiful and interesting 
> items go for pennies.
> 
> The money collector community and market is literally thousands of years old 
> and has a huge worldwide collector base. There are price guides to be found 
> that include highly esoteric topics with no concern about new collectors 
> being confused by retail versus wholesale. The pricing methodology is 
> outlined and the collector is urged to learn as much as they can about the 
> material and pricing. Same as meteorites no?
> 
> When I started seriously collecting meteorites a few years ago, I already had 
> some information about meteorites and vast experience as a collector, so the 
> first order of things for me was 1, determine which direction I wanted my 
> collecting to go. 2, determine which dealers were trustworthy and 3, how much 
> do I pay? 1 & 2 were easy but #3 was more difficult. I wish I knew of Kevin's 
> guide back then. It would have saved me some time and effort.
> 
> For me I'd like to see a few more guides, not less. I bet Michael could turn 
> a very nice profit if he sold PDF books of all the auction lots and prices 
> realized from this year and at all of his previous auctions too. I know I'd 
> buy a copy.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> --
> Richard Kowalski
> Full Moon Photography
> IMCA #1081
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 2/24/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Tucson Auction #1
>> To: "Kevin Kichinka" <[email protected]>, 
>> [email protected], 
>> [email protected]
>> Date: Thursday, February 24, 2011, 8:01 PM
>> Hi Kevin and list:
>> Kevin, while I appreciate what you are doing and applaud
>> you for putting together a detailed and extensive list, I
>> will just say that I think any price guides in any field are
>> problematic.  All collectibles are worth only what one
>> is willing to pay.  Coinage may be a different
>> situation since there is underlying value in the metal
>> commodity and there are fairly accurate mintage numbers.
>> 
>> A good example are home values.  An owner can ask 500k
>> for their home but only realize 300k in today's
>> "market".  Zillow.com is a great example of how a
>> "price guide" should work; they show the recently sold price
>> not asking prices (as you do in your guide).  If one
>> were to use asking prices the housing market would be
>> artificially higher than what is realized in the market.
>> 
>> I also think that price guides give collectors a false
>> sense of hope when it comes to selling their
>> collections.  For example, a dealer should be paying
>> them $10/g for Estherville (according to a price from your
>> list) when in fact I wouldn't pay more than $6/g, which is
>> perceived as "ripping" the collector off. This creates a
>> feeling of animosity for the collector and may result in
>> them not collecting any longer.
>> 
>> With meteorites or any other collectible for that matter, a
>> dealer (or any person with the item) can ask whatever he or
>> she wishes to ask.  The consumer is best served by
>> doing their own market analysis. As you pointed out there
>> are dozens of different reasons for assigning a value to a
>> meteorite, many of which are subjective (appearance,
>> freshness, orientation, etc.). Even the TKW is misleading if
>> one uses the MetBull as the standard for that.  Who
>> says that Allende is "worth" 10/g? The consumer does. Not
>> Kevin, not Matt, not Cap"n Blood. 
>> 
>> So while price guides may seem like a good idea and may be
>> perceived as educational, I think they offer little to no
>> value in the collectible marketplace.  I could go on,
>> but my fingers are tired from the Blackberry keyboard!
>> 
>> Matt
>> 
>> ------------------------
>> Matt Morgan
>> Mile High Meteorites
>> http://www.mhmeteorites.com
>> P.O. Box 151293
>> Lakewood, CO 80215
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to