Michael and All,
A 2mm Ribeye, draped over a 100 watt light bulb for 43 seconds turns out
perfect.
Micheal's words "habitual ways of thinking" may just boil down to (in my
opinion only) a natural transition from a new collector to a more seasoned
collector. When someone decides to begin collecting meteorites, for whatever
reason, and is trying to explain to family and friends about his/her new
venture--it just wouldn't work to show them your newest .006gm micro (this
is an extreme example) and expect them to look at it for more than 20
seconds but when you hand them any iron and EVERY single time they exclaim
"wow that's heavy for it's size"--now you have their interest and they want
to see more and most important they're more prone to listening to you about
your new hobby.
In my circles, i'm trying to get everyone i know to buy the biggest Campo
they can afford and learn & educate yourself. Hopefuly, one of them will,
one day, have the knowledge that you guys/gals have. Everyone starts
somewhere.
Personally, i'm on the side of as aesthetics and given the choice of a 4mm
vs a 2mm, i would probably take the 2mm-if it was a more revealing piece.
My true love is TS's and i have about another 40+ to post to the Eom. To me
it's like looking into the sole of the universe.
And that's my 3 oz's of Ribeye fat
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Blood" <[email protected]>
To: "Adam Hupe" <[email protected]>; "Meteorite List"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2011 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Point of Diminishing returns (Slice
thickness)?
Good points, Adam,
However, the collectors who are blind to any pricing
Elements but weight are NOT getting the best deals at all.
I sell the same way I collect.... Good is good and to me
How a specimen looks if far more important than mass.
Do I prefer a bigger specimen over a smaller specimen?
Of course, but I do not prefer a thicker slice over a thinner
Slice at all. If one is 4g and the other is 1.2g and the surface
Area is larger on the 1.2g and the price is the same, I will take
The 1.2 thinner slice with more surface area every stinking time.
If you can buy high fat ground beef for $2/lb or excellent
Ribeye stakes for $4/lb, which are YOU going to buy? I'll take
The Ribeye every stinking time.
I believe collectors are STARTING to get the point that
It is NOT the weight that is most important, but the visual
Quality that matters. Every Tucson Show for the last several
Years I have seen some screaming specimens sold for 4, 10 or
100 times the "normal" price per gram. I have bought some of
Them, myself.
I am always amazed that though I am certain the average
Meteorite collector has a substantially higher IQ than the
Public norm, so many of them are attached to narrow ways of
Thinking. However, any smart individual will eventually overcome
Habitual ways of thinking when repeatedly exposed to the logical
advantages of other ways of looking at things.
Michael
On 3/7/11 3:38 PM, "Adam Hupe" <[email protected]> wrote:
Most collectors go by the price per gram first so dealers who cut
ultra-thin
will take a loss when weight is the main consideration. I know that the
weight-to-surface area ratio is a secondary consideration for most
collectors
due to experience.
There are other factors like a decent polish being applied, proper
preparation
and specimen status including provenance that can affect price.
Best Regards,
Adam
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
