Just wondering why the Park Forest Main mass looks old and weathered
in the photograph?

 Was it found much later. I was expecting to see fresh crust and
matrix. I would never have guessed it was Park Forest.

Graham, UK

On 27 March 2011 09:38, Steve Witt <stelo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Was wondering if you any other detail of this main mass. Finder? Location? 
> Date of find? etc.
>
> thanx,
> Steve
>
>
> Steve Witt
> IMCA #9020
> http://imca.cc/
>
>
> --- On Sat, 3/26/11, bill kies <parkforest...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: bill kies <parkforest...@hotmail.com>
>> Subject: [meteorite-list] Park Forest Main Mass
>> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> Date: Saturday, March 26, 2011, 9:44 PM
>>
>> Thanks to Mark Hammergren, we have images of the Park
>> Forest main mass. At least, the largest one I know of. 5260
>> grams.
>>
>> http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y249/razor_wire/pfmainedit.jpg
>>
>> http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y249/razor_wire/pfmmedit.jpg
>>
>> http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y249/razor_wire/pfmainedit2.jpg
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> Visit the Archives at 
>> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to