Darryl Pitt wrote:

The "Letter to the Editor" referred to was, of course, edited.


Dear Darryl:

Your letter was eloquent, accurate, and precise, as one would expect from you. Even the edited version helps get the point across. Thank you for taking the time to do that.

I very much doubt that the "Times" will print Anne Black's excellent rebuttal -- as Eric noted, it is too long for a Letter to the Editor -- but we'll be getting it out there by other means.



Respectfully,

Geoff N.

www.aerolite.org
www.meteoritemen.com
www.meteoriteblog.org




______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to