*shameless plug* I've just added an article on Tunguska to my site:
http://historicfalls.com/2011/04/15/tunguska/ I know it's a slight cheat, not actually being an actual witnessed fall, but hey... What's the current thinking on the status of the impactor? Comet or Asteroid? It goes without saying that IMHO, ET's zapping us from 61 Cygni is not the likeliest answer...! Marko On 16 Apr 2011, at 00:28, Chris Peterson wrote: > There is no particularly good reason to think that Allende (or any other > meteorite) is cometary in origin. > > Chris > > ******************************* > Chris L Peterson > Cloudbait Observatory > http://www.cloudbait.com > > On 4/15/2011 5:04 PM, E.P. Grondine wrote: >> Hi all - >> >> The work on magnetism in meteorite parent bodies is interesting, but I >> thought that Allende's parent body was cometary. >> >> If so, shouldn't the headline read: "Comets found to have hard centers"? >> >> Or is this part of NASA's plan to have comets declared to be asteroids? >> >> E.P. Grondine > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
