Sterling,

On 24/04/2011 23:28, "Sterling K. Webb" <[email protected]>
wrote:

<snip>

>It takes a little over a joule to melt a gram of rock; that's
>the kinetic energy of that gram traveling at the sedate
>velocity of a mere 2100 m/s. A good-sized, high-speed
>impactor would turn to plasma with close to 100%
>efficiency.

<snip>

I followed all but the aboveŠ

Assuming physical properties for say pure ironŠ

Specific Heat Capacity for iron = 460 J/kg/degK
(http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/specific-heat-metals-d_152.html)
Melting point of iron = 1530 deg Celcius = 1803 Kelvin
(http://www.muggyweld.com/melting.html)
Assuming incoming temperature of impactor is 200 Kelvin
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_belt)

Then to raise the 1 gram impactor to its melting point requires a
temperature increase of 1603 K and the energy required to do this should
be roughly thisŠ
1603 x 0.001 x 460 = 737 Joules.

So a typical value would be more like one *Kilojoule* to melt a gram of
meteorite if I have my sums right (stone would be higher, maybe around
twice as much as iron)

Considered as kinetic energy, 1000 Joules would represent a velocity of
sqrt[1000/(0.5*0.001)] = 1414 m/s which is ballpark consistent with your
velocity estimate, but the energy you quote is a tad on the light side is
it not?

Regards,
John



______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to