Carl:
 
Ok
 
What is the TKW of this new lithology?
 
Do you have a Map of where it's been found?
 
Do you have any documentation at all??
 
Greg S.

----------------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 15:05:10 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [meteorite-list] Mifflin second lithology
>
> List,
> I am told that I need to add a few details to my defense of selling this 
> possible second (odd) looking lithology of Mifflin.
> I must admit that I am a bit shocked how quick some people are to be judge , 
> jury and executioner all in one swift swoop.
>
> Way back when this first started selling I received a phone call out of the 
> blue from John Helm. he informed me that he had purchased a slice of mifflin 
> from Greg C.and Greg gave him my number.
> I was a bit surprised because the reason I had partnered with Greg is because 
> he being a big dealer he would be able to get top dollar for our material. 
> Whereas on eBay I get chump change for the meteorites I sell. You see Greg 
> has a web site to sell from and I don't. This was to be a win win situation.
> Back to the call; John informed me that he was suspicious of his recent 
> acquisition from Greg. I told John that this was the first I'd heard of this 
> and I had never seen any of the material once cut by Greg. I told John i 
> would get right back with him.
> So, I called Greg and he had already looked into this between the time John 
> called him and me. Greg assured me that Dave Gheesling was already aware of 
> this second lithology and it was definitely being found at Mifflin 
> strewnfield.
> needless to say I was very happy this was so quickly resolved.
> I immediately called John back and explained to him that this is not only 
> good mifflin material but, may end up actually being worth more than the 
> other lithology because it appears to be more rare,
> John invited me to hunt with him if I ever get up to Wisconsin and we hung up 
> friends.
> It was not until a few weeks ago that Jason hit me with this bomb.
> I explained to Jason all of this and he chose not to agree with the situation.
> As I said before. Jason is entitled to his opinion but I think he overstepped 
> his boundaries before this ends up getting resolved.
> Obviously more testing is going to have to be done and Dirk Ross has offered 
> to have the testing done. I just need to get a piece of this second lithology 
> and send it to him in Japan.
> So, in the mean time people please relax and as was the case with NWA 5400 
> pairings. Be patient. That one took some special care as well but turned out 
> to be just fine. I certainly hope this turns out to be from the same fall but 
> we need the science to be sure. One thing is certain. There has been no scam 
> commited here and worse case is that everyone will get their money back.
> Thank you.
> Carl
> --
> Carl or Debbie Esparza
> Meteoritemax
> ______________________________________________
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list                       
>                   
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to