To me, the data seems supports it in some ways but not others. The results are so ridiculously strange I do not know what to think. Having volatile minerals condensing that close to the sun sure doesn't make sense to me. I guess we have to expect the unexpected like what are highly refractory minerals doing in a comet dust returned on the Stardust mission? It is beyond my understanding and will have to ask many questions like everybody else.
NWA 3133 is proposed to have come from the CV parent body not Mercury just to pinch off any confusion. In any case, weird results are always exciting. Best Regards, Adam ----- Original Message ---- From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: The List <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, June 17, 2011 4:44:55 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] The Case for Mercury So, Mr Hupe', where does this leave the "Possible case for Mercury" with our NWA 2999 or NWA 3133??? Enquireing minds would like to know ! You are far more knowledgeable than I in these matters. Pete IMCA 1733 ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
