Hi Matthias!

Do you think your Tatahouine was mined on Vesta by the Oumpa Lumpas! Unfortunately all the kings horses and all the kings men couldn't put Tatahouine together again, so we'll never know with 100.000...000% certainty if 99% of them all ever had any fusion crust.... :-( :-)

Won't you be surprised when you find that Vesta actually was mined by sly Oumpas living under Ries Crater that have a giant slingshot, perfect sense of masses, orbits and atmospheres of everything and have been mining Vesta to songs that have been heard for thousands of years ... by hurling projectiles on precisely calculated billiard-like trajectories at that return samples to Earth. Of course, each time a space-faring gaggle of geese pass by the returning stones, Vesta stones being so attractive to their eyes, they pick them right out of the path and bring them to earth during June and November migrations, and set them down somewhere in Africa where they pick at them like chicken feed and love the icing, until they shatter into zillions of pieces. - And you thought you had Tatahouine figured out now that you have that beautiful new stone ;-) But maybe you are on to something about why it is so difficult to know Vesta's "perfect" mass!

Happy Day!
Doug

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Bärmann <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; MexicoDoug <[email protected]>
Sent: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 12:43 pm
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] DAWN drives up to Vesta


Hi Doug, do you expect from this mission a precise calculation of Vesta's mass before/after begin of meteorite and namely HED collecting down here? Any secret mining there? When I've a look on my Green one: no single little trace of fusion crust and completely fragmented. That's suspicious :-) 
 
Best, 
Matthias 
 
----- Original Message ----- From: "MexicoDoug" <[email protected]> 
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> 
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2011 6:29 PM 
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] DAWN drives up to Vesta 
 
Hi Mike, 
 
Clearly, orbit was achieved at least by yesterday, at some point
probably > while we were chattering about this. Since they basically drove up to > Vesta and we don't know the outer limit with super accuracy there can be > no real time congratulation announcement. 
 
So a few more significant digits will need to be calculated on the
mass of > Vesta and then some engineer will rubber-stamp with hindsight an "official > time" of capture. But they will need to do a little more communication > with the spacecraft to determine precisely where it is to get that super > precise mass, and from that back out when orbit actually started which > might only be an estimate with the best data, anyway. So that is why this > is a different moseying up to Vesta capture that will be successful under > a wide range of mass assumptions. 
 
I don't know if this is being maintained accurately to reflect the >
maneuver into orbit, here's the link though: 
 
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/orbits/fullview4.jpg 
 
seems to be a simulation noting the relative speed between the probe
and > Vesta as well as the distance. It shows ~50 m/s (104 mph) and 13,100 km > 8,100 miles), and those numbers haven't changed much. That sounds like a > fast approach already so if the proposed two week descent is still the > plan and the image data accurate, at this point we are well past the > capture and have already started the orbital transition to lower altitude > (the two week decent into the first scientific orbit). 
 
Unless I'm doing something wrong, a normal satellite at that 13,100
km > distance would have an orbital speed of 82 miles/h (132 km/hr) and in a > circular orbit no relative speed toward Vesta instead of the 100 mph. 
 
The image numbers were 700 km further out and 3-5 km/h slower 10
hours ago > so it doesn't exactly add up, but it shows the ion engine is currently > thrusting and still approaching Vesta. Since the initial target orbit was > 15,000 km and they are around 13,000 km now from Vesta according to this > you might also imagine that either they decided to come in more closely, > or Vesta was more massive than calculated. 
 
Best wishes 
Doug 
 
 
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Galactic Stone & Ironworks <[email protected]> 
To: Sterling K. Webb <[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; MexicoDoug
<[email protected]
Sent: Sun, Jul 17, 2011 9:34 am 
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] DAWN drives up to Vesta 
 
 
Hi List, 
 
I fell asleep last night before 2:30am.  So what is the good word on 
Dawn?  Do we have orbit? 
 
As has it captured a photo yet of a mile-wide patch of diogenite 
exposed through the regolith?  ;) 
 
Best regards, 
 
MikeG 
 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-------- 
Galactic Stone & Ironworks - Meteorites & Amber (Michael Gilmer) 
 
Website - http://www.galactic-stone.com 
Facebook - http://tinyurl.com/42h79my 
News Feed - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516 
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone 
EOM -
http://www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com/collection.aspx?id=1564 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
-------- 
 
On 7/17/11, Sterling K. Webb <[email protected]> wrote: 
Doug, List, 
 
I suggest the very detailed "Dawn Journal" postings 
by Dr. Marc D. Rayman, Chief Engineer. Of course, 
he's busy right now! The last Journal log was June 
23, 2011, but the earlier extensive Journals have a 
lot of information. They can be found at: 
http://dawn.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/journal.asp 
 
On June 1, Dawn was closing at 540 mph. By 
June 23, about 250 mph. Currently, it's within 
your local speed limit 55-65 mph. Hands on 
the wheel and eyes on the road. 
 
    "The spacecraft will glide into a very high orbit 
in late July and continue thrusting, gently as always, 
until early August, when it will arrive in its survey 
orbit at an orbit at an altitude of about 2700 
kilometers (1700 miles)." 
 
You will note that Dawn is AHEAD of schedule 
now, gaining it more time at Vesta. Ion drive is 
like a video game -- play it right, you get bonus 
points. 
 
    "In survey orbit, the probe will be about 2700 
kilometers (1700 miles) above the surface. During 
the approach phase, navigators will measure the 
strength of Vesta's gravitational tug on the spacecraft 
so they can compute the giant asteroid's mass with 
much greater accuracy than astronomers have yet 
been able to determine it. (The mass is calculated 
now using observations of how Vesta perturbs the 
orbits of other asteroids and even of Mars.) That 
knowledge will allow them to refine the survey orbit 
altitude, and they may target it to be somewhat higher 
or lower, depending on whether Vesta is more massive 
or less massive than the current calculations show. 
The sequences for acquiring science data are being 
designed to accommodate a reasonable range of masses. 
    Dawn will be in a near-polar orbit. Its trajectory 
will take it over the north pole (which will be in 
darkness, because it will be northern hemisphere 
winter at that time), then over the terminator (the 
boundary between the illuminated and unilluminated 
sides), down over the equator, over the south pole, 
and then across the terminator again to pass over 
Vesta's night side. Such an orbit allows the spacecraft 
to have a view of virtually every part of the lit surface 
at some time. Each revolution in survey orbit will take 
2.5 to 3 days to complete. While this may seem like a 
leisurely pace, the spacecraft will be busy the entire time. 
    The primary objective of survey orbit is to get a broad 
overview of Vesta with color pictures and with ultraviolet, 
visible, and infrared spectra. The camera will obtain views 
with 250 meters (820 feet) per pixel, about 150 times 
sharper than the best images from the Hubble Space 
Telescope. The mapping spectrometer will reveal much 
of the surface at better than 700 meters (2300 feet) 
per pixel." 
 
Actually finding the Pole (so you can line up for a polar 
orbit) has been a problem. North? South? East? West? 
Front? Back? Which pole? Vesta's irregularity poses a 
limit on "How low can you go?" Interplanetary Limbo 
can be hazardous to your spacecraft... 
 
 
Sterling K. Webb 
 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------- 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MexicoDoug" <[email protected]> 
To: <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2011 11:36 PM 
Subject: [meteorite-list] DAWN drives up to Vesta 
 
 
Hi everyone with a bit of Vesta fun, 
 
This is a different kind of encounter to visit Vesta, not like
we're 
used to hearing about anyway from visits to the Moon, Mars.  At the 
moment, it's about 13,000 km (9,000 miles) to Vesta and like a nice 
Chevy Camaro (or a Ford Mustang in a pinch) DAWN is cruising along 
the 
interplanetary highway (route I-5 in honor of Vesta's soon to be 
crowning as a dwarf planet, the fifth planet, considering all roads 
lead to and from Earth).  Get ready to promote all of your HED 
meteorites ;-), even the moon isn't planetary according to the IAU 
... 
because where the rock is matters to them for some fool reason. 
 
Is there really much risk to the Vesta orbital insertion?  I'd say 
no, 
nothing to hold your breath over. Does anyone recall the
Six-Million 
Dollar Man - he pretty much could could run the approach to Vesta - 
heck even we could, so I'm imagining DAWN tooling along in slow 
motion 
just as he would, for the effect of speed (of course by slowing
down 
I need a psychologist to explain why we are now all conditioned
from 
television to feel speed when the film is slowed down with 
interesting 
sound effects). 
 
The real risk, I'm guessing has already been made and we are kind
of 
stuck with it and most depends on the assumption of Vesta's mass 
barring mechanical steering failure which is very unlikely during 
this 
critical maneuver considering the long track record and minimum of 
moving parts and that it would have to be for a much longer time
than 
a conventional propellant motor.  If the target is an initial orbit 
around Vesta at 100 km altitude, for example, I'm thinking how
close 
they will get to it since changing the course significantly on
these 
incredibly weak ion engines is like trying to turn the Titanic on a 
dime - you can't. The real risk would be to basically know the
mass 
of Vesta (or the product of G*M). I'm not sure how accurate that
it 
was known and I'm betting that a lot of work has gone into refining 
the number for the purpose of navigation on this mission. It
really 
wasn't that well determined before!  So that is already one benefit 
of 
the mission - Vesta's mass. 
 
I don't know the initial altitude insertion target, let's assume it 
is 
between 100 km and 500 km and somewhat circular (though an
eccentric 
orbit might be chosen), the spacecraft will accelerate to around
294 
to 377 mph (31 m/s to 168 m/s ; or, 474 to 606 km/h ) and the speed 
will determine the initial altitude. So as long as the spacecraft
is 
within that speed range, I think, and has decent pointing
capability 
(which is all happening in slow motion due to the nature of the 
engines), now, it is a done deal, whoever figured out a mass good 
enough to navigate to Vesta is a real hero here and deserves the 
congratultations - as the main power must be coming from the 
gravitational acceleration into Vesta now and the ion engine mostly 
secondary and primarily for (slow) steering manuevers. 
 
The other detail I see is that since Vesta isn't perfectly round,
if 
they don't pick an "iso-radial" or whatever you call a constant 
diameter great circle in Vesta that happens to not be oblong, I
think 
that even a circular orbit could be fun, like a ride at an amusment 
park - the ground could actually be going up and down below you 65
km 
during each orbit - at a 100 km orbit, that would be pretty
awesome. 
And also a reason not to start with an orbit too low right away for 
fear of getting Vesta whipped. Being in a circular orbit but
having 
it feel elliptical without doing anything! Charlie Sheen could
make 
better joke than I can here ... 
 
All this assumes no atmosphere.  That seems like a good assumption 
since many spectra have been taken of Vesta - but, there 
theoretically 
could be a a few patches of dust floating around.  With those huge 
(and beautiful work of art) solar panels that conceivable could be
consideration and would be a first instance of 
"micro-meteoroid-braking" a.k.a., sand-blasting. 
 
Lots of fun things to think about Vesta while they are still not 
confirmed, which won't last long ... just thought I'd note these 
thoughts in case anyone was interested while we all take a
vicarious 
walk to Vesta and route for the home team.  I guess I need a "blog" 
 
Best wishes 
Doug 
______________________________________________ 
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 
Meteorite-list mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 
 
______________________________________________ 
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 
Meteorite-list mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 
 
 
 
-- 
______________________________________________ 
Visit the Archives at >
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 
Meteorite-list mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 
 
 ______________________________________________ 
Visit the Archives at >
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 
Meteorite-list mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 
 
__________ Hinweis von ESET Smart Security, Signaturdatenbank-Version
6301 > (20110717) __________ 
 
E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET Smart Security. 
 
http://www.eset.com 
 
 

______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to