On August 26, 2002 at 08:29, Gary Frederick wrote: > The example archive has > <!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN"> > could you change that to perhaps > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> > or one of the others in the W3 catalog?
Since there is non-standard markup, I should probably not have a doctype declaration. I use the generic "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN" since the 4.01 spec includes "4.01" in the public identifier. This way, "-//W3C//DTD HTML//EN" can be mapped (via a catalog) to an appropriate DTD including non-standard extensions for any validation tasks. If you plan on using the resource file as a template for your archives, just change the doctype declaration to something you prefer if you plan on doing some kind of off-line validation of files. > You use <nobr>, That's an extension to the html standard. Then again, I don't > know of a standard way to do what <nobr> does :-( Exactly. It is probably possible to get a similiar effect with CSS, but the generated markup is also designed to deal with non-CSS, or minimal-CSS, clients inorder to get the desired rendering. --ewh --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE MHONARC-USERS
