I understand that the use of MSG-id's could be handy, but I like the clear sequence-numbering as it is now. I'm making a complex interface in javascript, and often refer to the sequence-number, and use it as a JS variable. If you start using long msg-ids like <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, they're harder to do JStricks with. (calculating, storing in strings/arrays etc.) Probably I'm overreacting, but do get my point ? Yours, Werner. _ Werner Teeling ________________________________\/\/______ _ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! ________________________________________
- msgid instead of seq. number for output files Achim Bohnet
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output files Christopher Lindsey
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output files Earl Hood
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output files Earl Hood
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output f... Christopher Lindsey
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output files Geoff Wing
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output files Achim Bohnet
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output f... Christopher Lindsey
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output f... Earl Hood
- Re: msgid instead of seq. number for output files Earl Hood
- Werner Teeling
