Earl,
Thanks for your reply!
On Wed, 29 Jul 1998, Earl Hood wrote:
>The W3C validator is incorrect.
I'm sure they would love to hear about it... Should I drop them a note?
>recommend using nsgmls (part of the SP package) to do your validation.
>SP implements a robust SGML parser, and pre-compiled versions are
>avilable for various platforms (if you do not want to compile
>it yourseld). Check out <URL:http://www.jclark.com/>.
Thanks! I once tried the old smgls, but I didn't understand one word of
the error messages it threw at me, but I would really love to see a
validator I could run on my own computer that tells me things I can
understand :-).
>browser to bypass any frames that were active. I guess I can make
>default behavior not set the TARGET attribute if not set via MIMEARGS.
Would be great!
>However, why not use the DTD with the frame element declarations?
Mainly because if I by ignorance use a transitional attribute, I want the
validator to tell me.... :-) Besides, I think it would be nice to use the
same DTD for the entire server, but that is of minor importance.
>Each following line overrides the preceding one. Try:
>
><MIMEArgs>
>text/plain; default=iso-8859-1 nonfixed quote
></MIMEArgs>
Ah, of course... Thanks!
> Also, the default option is not needed since iso-8859-1 is already the
> default.
Your documentation says:
default=charset
Character set to use as the default if no character set is
defined for the message. If option not specified,
"us-ascii" is used.
Friendly Tiddely-pom,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Graduate astronomy-student University of Oslo, Norway
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW-homepage:http://www.astro.uio.no/~kjetikj/
President, Norwegian Association of Physics Students [EMAIL PROTECTED]
