On August 9, 2000 at 23:11, Denis McKeon wrote:
> >> Now, I do not know if there is an RFC documenting In-Reply-To.
> >> Pointers welcome. I've relied on my experience with it since '88/89
> >> when I first starting using email.
> >
> >RFC822.
Duh (refering to myself). Did not event think to look in 822. I
should probably read through it entirely someday instead of just parts.
> >
> > "In-Reply-To" ":" *(phrase / msg-id)
> > "References" ":" *(phrase / msg-id)
> >
...
> Note that the RFC 1036 format for a References field is approximately:
>
> "References" ":" 1*(msg-id)
For References, MHonArc goes by 1036 and the usage of References
as used by newsgroups.
--ewh
