> Thanks Earl, I discovered that this appears to have resulted from > something like SunOS 4.x putting the wrong sign on its timestamps - that > +0600 was actually sent from the US CST timezone so it should have been > -0600, and many other similar ones in my archive from different sites. Cool, but that still leaves the question as to whether messages without "Re:" should take priority? -- Gerry Hickman (London UK)
- Subject-only thread order Andrew Johnson
- Re: Subject-only thread order Gerry Hickman
- Re: Subject-only thread order Andrew Johnson
- Re: Subject-only thread order Gerry Hickman
- Re: Subject-only thread order Earl Hood
- Re: Subject-only thread order Andrew Johnson
- Gerry Hickman
