On Thu, 05 Jul 2001 19:55:56 -0700
Earl Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On July 4, 2001 at 21:48, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> Where the happy spot is for you is a local decision. I don't
>> like paged indexes so I don't do those. I break my archives into
>> periods
> It seems paged indexes would be more usable than having a 2000
> message listing on a single page. Takes awhile to load over slow
> connections.
Yup. 2K is definitely at the end of the usable scale. 1K seems
workable on a 28.8K. Everything from there its a value choice. I
adjudge paged indexes more unfriendly than long load times on a
commonly reloaded/shared file and so took the single page route.
--
J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
I never claimed to be human.
