On Saturday, April 09, 2011 09:44:14 Mark Wallace wrote:
> I temporarily switched over to KDE.  I was using it until 4.0 came
> along and then learned the hard way when to duck for cover..
>
> But the nice thing about Ubuntu is that they are slow to get on a
> bandwagon.  There is a Firefox 4.0 out but they are still giving
> people 3.6.16.  I put 4.0 in a Windows system last night and none
> of my son's favorite add ons had upgraded, yet.
>
> Open office 3.0 was out for over six months before Ubuntu put it
> in their distro.   Let the slackware and Debian people polish it
> on their weekends.  The Ubuntu people want something that is ready
> to go, now.
>
> KDE 4.6  is still kind of buggy.  Things don't crash in it like
> they used to but i had to put Synaptic in it to see if I had a
> full install.   The package manager is not user friendly and you
> can't quickly see what options you have available with it.  It took
> three tries to get Microsoft core fonts installed because you have
> to accept an agreement and I don't think that the package manager
> in KDE can handle that.  It just fails to install.
>
> Mark

Ubuntu being "slow to get on the bandwagon"; actually I think of Ubuntu as an 
early adopter.  However their parent, Debian, tend to be more conservative, so 
Ubuntu ends up with an interesting mixture.  For example, when KDE4 was first 
released, Ubuntu was one of the distributions that quickly picked it up and 
released a beta version containing it, which is how I got to try it and see 
just how awful the very first version was at the time.  [At first it was quite 
unstable, but at the same time showed promise.]  It's since gotten 
tremendously better by comparison.

Today I'm using KDE 4.4.5 because that's what Debian is using in their 
repository, so I haven't seen KDE 4.6 yet.  At least the version of KDE 4.4.5 
in Debian is quite stable, although does show bugs occasionally.  Best I can 
suggest is to file detailed bug reports if possible, in order to help the 
maintainers know of them so that they can help fix them and report them 
upstream.  I still think KDE 4.4.5 isn't the "well oiled machine" that KDE 3.5 
was at its peak, and I'm still not using all of the capabilities that KDE4 
offers, either.  

When it comes to OpenOffice 3, Debian Stable has it -- but the other branches 
have moved on to LibreOffice.  I'm not sure where Ubuntu stands on this -- 
last I remember I think their plan was to migrate to LibreOffice as well.  
Here again I consider Ubuntu to actaully be an early adopter.  In this case I 
think it's simply a matter of being the best decision because OpenOffice is 
going to stagnate under Oracle due to most of the development team working on 
LibreOffice, and Oracle demanding developers to choose to work on one or the 
other, but not both, which has accelerated their departure from OpenOffice.

Concerning the KDE4 package manager, I'm assuming you're speaking of 'Adept'.  
I've used it under Ubuntu in the past, but because I do so much package 
management via ssh I tend to use the command line tools like 'aptitude' 
instead.  The problem you're mentioning concerning questions not showing up 
during an upgrade may have to do with the 'debconf' package, which is what 
dictates what method to use to ask a question.  If you try running this at the 
command line:

   sudo dpkg-reconfigure debconf

and try using the "KDE" option.  That should allow Adept to ask you package 
related questions via a KDE GUI rather than sending those queries to a text-
based dialog box that you won't see.


Concerning Firefox 4; this is interesting, as originally Debian Unstable had 
Iceweasel 3.5 and Experimental had 3.6 -- but recently after some discussion 
Debian has made a difficult joint decision to stick with 3.5 for Unstable and 
have upgraded to 4.0 in Experimental, skipping over 3.6.  From the user 
perspective I feel that 3.6 is better than 3.5 as well as 4.0, but from the 
developer standpoint there are a plethora of library dependencies that have to 
be standardized on for other packages, and going with 4.0 makes much more 
sense in that regard.  Sticking with 3.6 would have put off migration pain 
until later but also made migration more difficult, especially being that 
Mozilla is planning on releasing Firefox 5 sometime this year.


  -- Chris

--

Chris Knadle
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Mid-Hudson Valley Linux Users Group                  http://mhvlug.org
http://mhvlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mhvlug

Upcoming Meetings (6pm - 8pm)                         MHVLS Auditorium
  May 4 - Inkscape
  Jun 1 - Zimbra
  Jul 6 - Jul 2011

Reply via email to