Hi Rob, obvious question is what MICO exactly do you use, on which platform (OS/compiler versions). By MICO version I mean either release number or what is your last patch in darcs repo if you use repo.
Thanks, Karel On 11/27/15 07:56 PM, Rob Ratcliff wrote: > Hi, > > We've noticed recently that calls to _non_existent() are coming back > true even when the remove object is active and the communication thread > on the remove is blocked for a period due to it being busy with tasking. > (We are currently running MICO single threaded currently due to using > Combat.) I am going to try moving long running tasks to another thread > in the object, but is there a configurable timeout parameter or some > other parameter that would impact the behavior of the _non_existent() > call? (I only saw a timeout related to messaging if that was enabled.) > > Thanks, > > Rob > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Mico-devel mailing list > Mico-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mico-devel > -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Mico-devel mailing list Mico-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mico-devel
