On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Rpnpif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With gqcam, the things are very different. > Without this patch and USB1.1, the image was partially drawn. Now with USB2 > the image is complete and stable, but too bright or too white. Setting light > or contrast has not effect. > With the patch and USB1.1, no image was avaliable. > With the patch and USB2, yes ! For the first time the image is fine !!!... > but... > But a flicking appears at a frequency about 1.5Hz (about all the 0.7 seconds). > > With ekiga, no image but magenta lines in diagonals are on a white background. > With kopete, the image is running quickly from rigth to left. > > So good progress. > > -- > Alain rpnpif
Hi Alain Wow, so finally a success report with this patch ! But we are so disappointed ;-0 So common' make a screenshot/video or two, Dim the lights, take off your shirt, put on some soul music dance a little, for inspiration look here ;-) https://microdia.googlegroups.com/web/JwmCapture.avi OK I believe the issue is that the current SN9C20x init functions work correctly for descrete webcams[1] integrated webcams will require tweaking (all register reset) > But a flicking appears at a frequency about 1.5Hz (about all the 0.7 seconds). This is the auto exposure/white balance etc fighting each other. -JoJo [1] descrete webcams : seperate from computer can be plugges in/out of a USB port --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Lets make microdia webcams plug'n play, (currently plug'n pray) To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Visit us online https://groups.google.com/group/microdia -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
