Hey,If you now a bit more about rpms maybe you can help the suse users - they keep complaining that theirs is outdated ;) .
I really just took the gspca-spec and made it work for us. I don't have a clue what's actually going on.
GWater Linux Rockz schrieb:
Didn't know you had a spec file already and were going to build one. But yes I basically created the same spec file. :) Just one less thing for me to do :) Thanks On Nov 23, 5:40 am, GWater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I just checked - the specs in pkgmicrodia still work fine. GWater JoJo jojo schrieb:Hi were you using the scripts located here? http://repo.or.cz/w/pkgmicrodia.git we plan to make an official release this month-end (hopefully the development branch this time) the version numbers are just yyyy.mm year/month format. packages can have whichever version number, the package maintainer sees fit. Once we are sure, which version to release, we'll change the driver version date that day. Hopefully, we wont have to bother with version numbers once driver, is in the kernel tree. -JoJo On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Linux Rockz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I have built a kmod rpm for this driver for Fedora 9. So..... Just wondering if you have plans to actually give the driver a "real" version? Are planning to post a current tarball on the site? While for personal building it's not that big of a deal, It would make the rpm more "repository friendly". Thankssignature.asc < 1KViewDownload--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Lets make microdia webcams plug'n play, (currently plug'n pray) To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Visit us online https://groups.google.com/group/microdia -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
