On Sunday 08 March 2009 12:40:17 Stefan Krastanov wrote: > OK, my mistake, but still why min_stable and max_stable instead in between > ( (70+140)/2 if I am getting right the initialization function)? And I'm > writing it in the moment, I am a bit slow, sorry ;)
Yep, that's better, I don't remember why I've chosen "double ranges" :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
