Am Donnerstag 11 Juni 2009 20:00:47 schrieb Brian Johnson:
> I've already done the error handling on create_sysfs as well.
>
> I don't really have individual patches against our repository since
> all these things i've been fixing are based in the six patches against
> the kernel I'm preparing. I am attaching a patch you can apply to the
> HEAD of prepare-for-kernel that should sync it against the current
> kernel codebase I'm using.
>

It seems there really is nothing left to do ;).

Anyway upon testing I noticed several things:
1. Compiling without evdev fails because of one dev->input_gpio in the probe 
function. It seems this needs an extra
#ifdef EVDEV_bla
since sn9c20x_initialize() uses dev->input_gpio directly after that. Maybe 
that part of sn9c20x_initialize should be moved to input_init()?

2. dmesg says that my cam is accessable vie /dev/video1 while it is actually 
using /dev/video0. Has something in the nameing conventions changed? (I use 
Fedora11. They have moved some parts of HAL over to DeviceKit. However I don't 
know whether this is caused by HAL at all).

Apart from that - great. Let' go fast lane for 2.6.31 ;)

GWater

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to