I was just rereading this post for thoughts on marking up titles. At the same time, the thread on invisible data got me to thinking:
--- Chris Hibbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The beginning of the review is annotated thusly: > > <div class="hreview"> > <span class="version" style="display: none;">0.2</span> > <abbr class="dtreviewed" title="20051108T2318-0700"></abbr> > <span style="display: none;" class="reviewer fn">Chris > Hibbert</span> > <a style="display: none;" > href="http://www.rebelfirerock.com/" > class="item url fn">RebelFire: Out of the Gray Zone</a> > <span class="description"> > <p> > <span class="booktitle">RebelFire: Out of the Gray Zone</span> > feels like a juvenile, in the sense of Heinlein's Juveniles ... > > That's a lot of non-human-visible annotation. So why have the non-visible data? You have the title visible AND invisible with a link. Why not just combine them into something like: <div class="hreview"> <span class="version" style="display: none;">0.2</span> <abbr class="dtreviewed" title="20051108T2318-0700"></abbr> <span class="description"> <p> <a href="http://www.rebelfirerock.com/" class="item url fn title-book">RebelFire: Out of the Gray Zone</span> Note that I also deleted the "reviewed by" piece with you also had invisible. In looking at your blog (http://pancrit.blogspot.com/2005/11/rebelfire-out-of-gray-zone.html) I see that at the end of the posting is "posted by Chris Hibbert". Couldn't that be marked up to be the reviewer section of the hReview? Might this also work for some of the others questioning how to put reviewer information into their hReviews? ~ Tim <a href="http://www.tjameswhite.com">www.tjameswhite.com</a> <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=12227&t=1">Get Firefox!</a> __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
