On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:02 AM, David Janes -- BlogMatrix wrote:
Have at it:
http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom
Some comments (sorry, its taken me awhile to get to this):
1. I notice that "feed title" and "feed permalink" have been deferred
to future versions (see http://microformats.org/wiki/
hatom#Nomenclature). Any reasons why? I must be missing something,
'cause these seem easy to me.
2. Not to pick nits, but datetime's probably don't *have to* use the
datetime-design-pattern. People who want to are free to publish the ISO
3. I see that we're allowing multiple feeds per page. I wonder what
the pros and cons of this are?
4. Why do we prefer <h#> over class="title" for entry titles?
5. "Entry Permalinks MUST be absolute URIs". Why? We have well
established rules for relative urls.
6. quote:
there can be at most 1 Entry in an XHTML document without an Entry
Permalink; the Entry Permalink of this Entry is the URI of the page
This rule is needed for media pages (i.e. a news article on
cnn.com). There is some ugliness of with this because the URI could
be non-canonical."
I'm not sure I follow this and don't see anything on the
brainstorming page about it.
7. "the machine readable datetime should be encoded with an <abbr> ".
Again, maybe this *should* should be a *may* ?
8. Open item for the list:
if there is no Entry Updated and Entry Published elements,
transformation to Atom is problematic
This is because a published element is required. Suggestions would
be appreciated here.
Alright, so I'm going to stop before digging into the xmdp and
parsing details. Forgive me, david if any of this is ignorance.
-ryan
--
Ryan King
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
