On Dec 23, 2005, at 6:04 AM, Frederic de Villamil wrote:
Hi list,
I was lately thinking about a way to tell the most accurate way that a
link points to a page with content not suitable for people under a
certain age, such as porn, violence... the list should be long.
This reflexion came after a French law was voted that force Internet
providers to provide a parental control tool to every user. I think
having a microformat doing that sort of thing would greatly help those
tools to work, much more than page content analysis which is not
always
relevant.
I've been thinking about vote-links, and I'm wondering why we could
not
use rev="pg13" or rev="pg16" in links the way we use vote-for and
vote-against in vote links.
It is an abuse of the 'rev' semantics. "pg13" does not describe the
*reverse relationship* between the two documents.
These kind of 3rd party assertions don't work very well on the web.
-rk
--
Ryan King
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
