Hi Paul,
Is the class="xoxo" only allowed on the primary parent? Would this be
broken?
I don't think it is "forbidden", but as a practical matter I don't
think it should (or even -can-) be "required." Speaking at least for
myself, I don't want to have to tag every sublist. This is one of
those cases where (as usual ;-) its better to make the parser-writer
do a little extra work to make things easier on the content creator.
-- Ernie P.
On Dec 28, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Paul Bryson wrote:
For the sake of simplicity in JavaScript, it would be nice to be
able to
give all <ul> in an XOXO the class="xoxo". So I might have:
<ul class="xoxo">
<li><a>Linkblogs</a>
<ul class="xoxo">
<li>dive into mark b-links</li>
<li>Erics Weblog</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><a>Another link</a></li>
</ul>
Is the class="xoxo" only allowed on the primary parent? Would this be
broken?
Atamido
"Paul Bryson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrotexoxo
The XOXO format doesn't seem to allow, or specify, the use of heading
elements for multi-level outlines, such as <h2>, <h3>, etc. Is
there a
reason for this?
This example uses <p>
http://diveintomark.org/public/2004/01/xo-embeddable.xo
This one uses <span> and <a>
http://homepage.mac.com/ctholland/thelab/outlines/
Also, none of these examples seem to use class="xoxo" in them. Is
this a
required feature, or optional?
Atamido
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
